Whats the Difference Between a Hydrogen Bomb and a Typical Atomic Bomb On Sunday, North Korea detonated what they claimed to be a hydrogen bomb and the weapon test has prompted serious concern from the U. S. and allies. But what makes a hydrogen bomb scarier than a regular atomic bomb Check the news and youre guaranteed to hear to about conflict in some part of the world. Abstract. This section covers the Cisco 3700 Series Access Points theory of operation and installation as part of a Cisco wireless LAN WLAN solution. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications IJERA is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research. Radiation Efficiency Of Patch Antenna Images' title='Radiation Efficiency Of Patch Antenna Images' />InformationWeek. News, analysis and research for business technology professionals, plus peertopeer knowledge sharing. Engage with our community. What Causes the Greenhouse Effect June 13th, 2015 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D. ButRead more Read. For one, typical atomic bombs use nuclear fission, or the splitting of unstable uranium or plutonium atoms, to enhance a bombs blasting power. When the atoms are split, their subatomic neutrons go free, splitting up more atoms and unleashing devastating amounts of energy. These types of atomic bombs were the ones used in World War II against Japan, and theyre what experts believe North Korea has been testing up until now. But the tremors felt during Sundays test may have belonged to a hydrogen bomb blast, albeit a small onethough experts are still skeptical. Hydrogen bombs, or thermonuclear bombs, are actually a lot scarier than your run of the mill atomic bombs. They have thermonuclear fuel inside that can be ignited during the first stage, which is still powered by nuclear fission. Windows Quick Launch'>Windows Quick Launch. But H bombs have another trick up their sleeve. They employ a second stage of reactions using nuclear fusion the force that powers the sun to basically magnify the destructive force of a typical atomic explosion. As the fusion of deuterium and tritium types of hydrogen occurs and atoms link together, they fire off neutrons to create even more destructive power in a chain reaction when they come in contact with the bombs uranium layer. If you thought atomic bombs were bad, these things are truly nasty. This is advice I hope you never need but should know anyway. A nuclear attack is everybodys worstRead more Read. To give you some perspective, one of the first high yield thermonuclear bombs the U. S. tested at Bikini Atoll in 1. Castle Bravo, was over 1,0. Little Boy, dropped on Hiroshima in 1. Enola Gay. That bomb killed 6. In fact, the Castle Bravo blast was so intense, its designers were taken by surprise when it went off. They miscalculated the yield of the blast by almost 1. Another way to explain the difference in devastation an atomic bomb could kill half of Manhattan a hydrogen bomb could vaporize the entire city of New York. Still, experts are skeptical that North Korea has the capability to build and detonate a hydrogen bomb. This isnt even the first time theyve claimed to do such a thing either. In January of 2. 01. The notion of an h bomb test is concerning, but its also possible North Korea tested whats known as a boosted atomic bomb. These boosted bombs just add a little thermonuclear gas to the bombs atomic core, increasing the blast yield, but not nearly as much as a hydrogen bomb. Theyre only about three times the blasting power as Little Boy. For now, well have to wait and see what U. S. reconnaissance can tell us in the coming days. Update Castle Bravo was not the first thermonuclear device tested by the U. S. that honor goes to Ivy Mikeit was the first in a series of high yield nuclear device tests. The text above has been changed to reflect the correct information. Thanks WShaw. Christian. Low profile patch antennas for biomedical and wireless applications. Printed microstrip fed antennas based on a slotted radiating patch are proposed herein. First, a basic rectangular antenna without any slots was designed, being suitable for wideband applications and showing impedance bandwidth of 2. MHz for S1. 1 lt 1. B. Next, dual band operation for worldwide interoperability for microwave access Wi. MAX, from 3. 1. 1 to 3. GHz and wireless local area network WLAN, 4. GHz was obtained by including slots only on the left side of the basic design. Then, using a structure with slots on the right side of the radiating patch, WLAN operation was obtained in the frequency range of 2. GHz. The fourth antenna, with slots on both sides of the patch, was characterized and realized for biomedical applications at 2. GHz S1. 1 lt 1. B. The proposed antennas can be realized with small ground plane size and total antenna area of only 2. This reduction in total antenna area is achieved by using a truncated patch. All the simulations were carried out using Empire XCcel. The designs were characterized based on their radiation pattern, return loss, voltage standing wave ratio VSWR, gain, and current distribution. The simulated and measured results show good compatibility. Charles Mingus Ah Um Rar.